Maricopa Audit Reports Are In!

If you have been following along or not following along with the AZ Maricopa county audit here are the reports.  You will find that ElectionCrisis authors were indeed correct on some of there findings as the Official Audit reports confirmed.  Please take a few min to read the reports found here:

Official Audit Reports

https://www.azsenaterepublicans.com/audit

We The People AZ Alliance Report

https://www.scribd.com/document/527239370/IGA-Report-by-We-The-People-AZ-Alliance

ElectionCrisis Past Reports

https://netconcepts.syncedtool.com/shares/file/XkeCrvgImqN/

https://netconcepts.syncedtool.com/shares/file/qMcWbxgqFvj/

Transparency: "Most transparent tabulation center ever!" Chris Krebs?

Transparency.jpg

"It's the people" - Dead on! Same people, same problem

I have a suspicion this is how it will go down if Dominion and Maricopa County give up passwords:

Richer speaks, but has a small issue with truth.

Interview with Shelby Bush. Richer vs. the source code.

*Update*  This story keeps shifting between Dominion and Maricopa County. How can we trust the county who can't give us straight answers?

Maricopa County does not have an admin account on their Dominion equipment. The routers appear to be tied to upstream equipment "connected" that is likely connected to the internet. There appear to be no admin accounts with access to local equipment only. There is a real question of how any system, election, school, or otherwise, would be adequately protected in their custody.

Is Dominion sharing passwords with multiple jurisdictions?  Why else would you not give out a password then just reset it on equipment in use?

“Releasing Dominion’s intellectual property to an unaccredited, biased, and plainly unreliable actor such as Cyber Ninjas would be reckless, causing irreparable damage to the commercial interests of the company and the election security interests of the country,” Dominion’s statement said. “No company should be compelled to participate in such an irresponsible act.”

Source: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/arizona-senate-republicans-sign-lease-to-continue-vote-audit/2021/05/13/04c59a24-b426-11eb-bc96-fdf55de43bef_story.html

Dear Maricopa County, may I have a copy of the risk assessment for Dominion?

It's not one of the goals of the EAC to evaluate supply chain risk, political entanglements, conflicts of interests, associated suppliers, or anything else that could make a supplier of voting equipment to be a risk to elections.  This is the responsibility of the state and counties looking to purchase the equipment.

It's very interesting Mr Jarrett used "Post elections audits found the equipment was accurate and not vulnerable to hacking." There is NOTHING in either report that discusses a vulnerability assessment was conducted. Nothing regarding penetration tests, all industry standards. I would be surprised if they did and if they would ever allow an independent body outside of those who certify it and certify the source code to run any kind of true assessment.  Vulnerabilities in these systems are actually well documented.

How can we trust any body to run elections that avoids transparency and uses deception to communicate with the public?

Az Senate Audit

We take issue with the router response, it is a far more telling and deeper issue of the counties neglect of critical systems.

Dominion had access to the Dominion equipment where the election officials did not. That does violate NIST guidelines, it's the same as a contractor left alone in the server room. Does that violate some election law? It may violate the very law that Katie Hobbs complained to the Arizona State Attorney Generals office about maintaining security and control of ballots. The router issue is two fold. 1. It demonstrates that it isn't a true "closed network." A hacker would be able to exploit a vulnerability and traverse both networks if one was discovered. 2. There is no administrative separation between management of Sheriff network vs election network. They should be able to provide an administrative account that only has access to election router. Claiming otherwise is a lie but it's showing their cards when it wasn't necessary. Why is deception the rule with the county?

Maricopa County Audit

Conflicts of Interest?

The very firms selected for the audits or "certified" to conduct the audits have some questionable entanglements.

This is a comprehensive article discussing the conflicts: https://themarketswork.com/2020/11/20/the-small-world-of-voting-machine-certification/

"Pro V&V, like Dominion Voting and Smartmatic, is a member of CISA’s Sector Coordinating Council, the same council that recently issued the joint statement on the 2020 presidential election. The other primary testing lab, SLI Compliance, is also a member of the same council."

In the article, there are some interesting names listed there with conflicts that lead directly to Twitter.  Interesting how that works.

In Information Technology security standards, you avoid conflicts of interest at all costs.  It would be against either company's self-interest to find fault in the audit.

We conducted a review of these two audits and some of the intelligence leading up to and after the 2020 election.

Read more ....

Hacking Closed networks